Each week I have continued to strengthen my confidence and proficiency by exploring strategies for seamlessly integration of technology into my content area instruction. As part of that journey, I will work through the process of developing, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating my personal GAME plan. Monitoring allows me to “continually think about and modify my current behaviors based on the thought processes that occur simultaneously with action” (Cennamo, Ross & Ertmer, 2009, p. 11).
Resources
The first requirement for my GAME plan was to incorporate my Smart board daily and implement my student response units to help assess my students both formally and informally. “This type of live polling of responses is ideal for monitoring learning through formative assessment and can help you and your students quickly determine content areas that require further instruction or where there are obvious gaps” (Cennamo, Ross & Ertmer, 2009, p. 145). Since I have limited “Smart” knowledge, I must rely on the technology professionals from our county. I sent an email to the technology department to inquire about up and coming Smart board trainings. Also, I sent a personal email to one of the specialists about learning the student response units. I haven’t gotten a response from the general email pertaining to the trainings, but the personal email was replied to. She offered to come out one day during our preplanning week to help get the students response systems up and running. She also offered any help needed with the Smart board. I was pleasantly surprised that she was so willing to meet me. There are only two technology specialists for the whole county, so I didn’t have high hopes.
My second requirement was to use my position as department head to help guide other teachers with the use of technology. I sent my principal an email asking to lead one of the sessions during preplanning. The second day of preplanning is set aside for sessions such as teaching with inclusion, differentiation, building relationships with students, and TECHNOLOGY. I will have 4 groups of teachers for 45 minutes each to help guide them through some simple tools to use with their students. I am a little nervous that I may make a mistake or the internet will go down or something, but excited for the opportunity.
Modify Action Plan
I may need to modify my action plan to allow for collaboration with our school keyboarding teacher. My principal’s email response asked why I would teach technology when the technology teacher is the one qualified. She thought I would be more apt to teach reading or writing strategies. I told her I could incorporate them both, and she applauded my efforts, but has now wondered why our keyboarding teacher has not been more involved. Oops! “Teachers who lack knowledge of how to use technology are inadequately prepared to provide their students with meaningful access to technologies that may be readily available in a school” (Cennamo, Ross & Ertmer, 2009, p. 176).
Learned
I have learned that if you don’t ask for something, you won’t get it. I just assumed that our technology specialists would be too busy to help me set up my student response units, and did not use the opportunity last year. Also, it is important to involve colleagues and administration in the planning and execution of my GAME plan to avoid any animosity.
Questions?
The only question I have so far is, can I use my student response units daily to check for understanding or does it consume too much time? From the technology specialist’s email, it sounds like the process of setting them up can be quite cumbersome, but once they are in use they can benefit class instruction immensely.
Resources
Cennamo, K., Ross, J., & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful
classroom use: A standards-based approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning